In this article, we discuss the conflicting nature of heritage which is usually silenced by its powerful representation as a cultural, social and economic capital, and as a sign of distinction. We will focus on tango and fallas and how they both became registered in the Representative List of Intangible Heritage. Based on those cases, we explore the hegemonic dimension of heritage processes as well as the bellicose local resistances that confront the logic of neoliberal heritage. The examples throw some light on the conflicts that may arise between the different interests, logics and agents involved in heritage processes. They also reveal the nature of the political and economic contexts that make the heritagisation possible. Beyond the distances and specificities of our two cases, they expose how the two nominations coincide with specific policies of urban regeneration, known as the New Urban Policy (NUP). Neoliberal globalization articulated around the intangible economy and the cultural and leisure industry take shape within the smart cities which redefine old places into new urban spaces. Intangible heritage plays a key role in these processes.

The results of morphometric and technical analyses of 103 small stemmed projectile points from the north of Chubut province (Patagonia, Argentina) are presented. These artifacts were collected in three ecologically differentiated but adjacent environments: the maritime coast, the middle and the lower valley of the Chubut River, and the northern-central plateau. The specimens were obtained during archaeological research and from a private collection. The goal of this research is to identify trends and to explore their relationship with technological-based decisions and the circulation of raw materials, objects, designs, and information among different groups. Although highly intra and interarea morphological diversity is recorded, three subtypes predominate: straight or slightly convex triangular edges, stems with straight edges and concave bases. Two of these subtypes have not yet been identified in the archaeological literature from other parts of Patagonia. Statistical analyses – ANOVA and PCA, carried out on the metric attributes of the stem, did not show significant differences. Chalcedony, obsidian, and fossilized wood from spatially circumscribed sources were proven to be the most frequent raw materials among the three areas, supporting different models of intensification of exchanges in central and northern Patagonia by the end of late Holocene.