SCImago Journal & Country Rank
                         

  

♣

VULNERABILIDAD ESTRUCTURAL Y MARXISMO LACANIANO: UNA PROPUESTA DE ARTICULACIÓN TEÓRICA PARA COMPRENDER LA DETERMINACIÓN ESTRUCTURAL DE LA SALUD MENTAL EN MIGRANTES INDÍGENAS

STRUCTURAL VULNERABILITY AND LACANIAN MARXISM: A PROPOSAL FOR A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK TO UNDERSTAND THE STRUCTURAL DETERMINATION OF MENTAL HEALTH IN INDIGENOUS MIGRANTS

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-73562026000100521

Verónica Jiménez-RochaORCID and Carlos Piñones-RiveraORCID


Key Words: Structural violence, critical medical anthropology, critical theory, migrant health, health of Indigenous peoples and psychoanalysis

Abstract

Approaches to the mental health issues of Indigenous migrants have been criticized for their culturalist and psychologistic biases, their ahistoricity, and depoliticization — in short, for their lack of structural understanding. This article aims to contribute to the development of such a structural understanding by discussing critical medical anthropology and critical psychology and proposing a complementarity between the Structural Vulnerability and Lacanian Marxism frameworks. To this end, a literature review and qualitative content analysis were conducted to highlight the contributions of each perspective. In summary, Structural Vulnerability stands out for offering a pragmatic critical approach that goes beyond a culturalist understanding of patients to focus on the structural forces that determine poor health outcomes, promoting structural intervention and direct dialogue with health professionals. In turn, Lacanian Marxism stands out for its epistemological openness to other subalternized psychological logics, allowing subjectivity to be addressed by overcoming certain entrenched habits of thought such as the mind/body division. The article concludes that the consideration of the structural determination of health and the notion of structural violence serve to articulate both perspectives, allowing each to remedy the other’s limitations.

Print Email

BETWEEN INSTITUTIONAL SOUND ARCHIVES AND THE MUSICAL MEMORIES OF THE QOM PEOPLE

ENTRE ARCHIVOS SONOROS INSTITUCIONALES Y MEMORIAS MUSICALES DEL PUEBLO QOM

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-73562026000100522

Rosario HaddadORCID


Key Words: Sound archives, memories, Qom, field recording and music

Abstract

This article examines two different ways of working with sound recordings. On the one hand, the institutional sound archives of the Qom people from the ‘Carlos Vega’ National Institute of Musicology, between 1964 and 1996; and on the other hand, the sound recordings made in collaboration with the same Indigenous people in Chaco between 2008 and 2010, part of my own fieldwork. First, I provide an overview of the origin and context of these recordings, considering that they emerge from different initiatives: institutional and collaborative. Then, I problematize the categories and forms of representation through which the musical expressions of Indigenous peoples were recorded, documented and classified in the institutional archive. Finally, drawing on the collaborative sound recordings, I analyze the ways in which the Qom people reconstruct the ‘ancient music’, incorporate contemporary music, and articulate memories with historical experiences of the monte. This allows the logics, languages, silences and regimes of power-knowledge that constituted both archives to be recovered and brought into dialogue.

Methodologically, the work combines the ethnography of the institutional archive with collaborative ethnography and the analysis of written documents from the institutional sound records and musical memories in the collaborative fieldwork. The article seeks to contribute to debates on memory and sound archiving in Indigenous contexts.

Print Email